Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10454 (AP)

Mannem Prasada Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP(PIL)/54/2025 · 2025-09-09

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ik APH^10119212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WP(PIL) NO: 54 OF 2025 Between: 1. Mannem Prasada Rao, S/o Subba Rao Aged about 56 Years, R/o D.No. 4-21, Gunda Vari street Gurazalla, Palnadu District-522415 Aadhar No. 8685 2921 0256 Ph No. 9849483198 Bank Account No. 62287045147 PAN No. AIZM0466F Bank Name State Bank of India (Gurazala) 2. Kukkamudi Annarao, S/o Devadanam Aged about 42 years R/o D.No. 1-354, Christian Pet, Gurazala, Palnadu District-522415 Aadhar No. 6988 1583 1830 Ph No. 9866635012 Bank Account No. 62329519603 PAN No. ENPPK3643K Bank Name State Bank of India (Gurazala Branch) 3. Kanneganti Yesobu, s/o saidulu Aged about 40 years, R/o D.No. 2- 127, opposite to SBI Bank Gurazalla, Palnadu District- 522415 Aadhar No. 6367 0400 1459 Ph No. 7396110824 Bank Account No. 016110100176090 PAN No. HYPK4634R Bank Name Andhra Bank (Gurazala branch) ...Petitioners AND 1. state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its PrI. Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department A P Secretariat Buildings Velagapudi Amaravathi Guntur Dist. Andhra Pradesh. 2. Grama Sachivalayams and Ward Sachivalayams GSWS, Rep. by its APIIC Commissioner / Director Plot No 11 and 12 Nirmaan Bhavan, Colony Road, Auto Nagar, Vijayawada,Andhra Pradesh 520007 3. Andhra Pradesh State Institute of Rural Development and Panchayat APSIRD and PR, Raj APSIRD and PR, Rep. by its Director, SPRC/DPRC Building, PR Engineers Colony Kanuru, Vijayawada, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh, Pincode-520007. 4. The District Collector, Palnadu district Narasaraopet 5. The Ward Sachivalayam No 1, Rep. By its Ward Secretary Gurazalla town, Palnadu District 6. The Ward Sachivalayam No 2, Rep. By its Ward Secretary Gurazalla town, Palnadu District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ. Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus against the Respondents in shifting the 1 St Ward Ward ND Sachivalayam (sachivalayam for 2,3,9 and 10 wards) and 2 SACHIVALAYAM (Sachivalayam for 1,18,19 and 20 wards) from the centre of the town to the outskirts of the town in private building making it inaccessible to the public as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of Article 14 and well-settled principles of natural justice and consequently and direct the respondents to shift the Ward Sachivalayam to its prior location in the centre of the town. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to continue operating the Grama Sachivalayam from the government building situated in the centre of Gurazala Town pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2,3,5 and 6: GP for Village and Ward Secretariats Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 :GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: 1 APHC010119212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No:-33 AT AMARAVATI [3483] WP(PIL) NO: 54 of 2025 Mannem Prasada Rao and Others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: Advocate(s) for Respondent(s); GHANTASRIDHAR GP FOR REVENUE, GP for Village and Ward Secretariats, GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 10th September 2025 ORDER: (Per Sri Justice Ravi Cheemalapati) The present Public Interest Litigation has been filed highlighting the issue of shifting the 1 and 2 Ward Sachivalayains from the centre of the town to the outskirts of the town in a private building making it inaccessible to the public. 2. Heard Sri Ghanta Sridhar, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner while reiterating the contents of the 3. affidavit would contend that, by virtue of G.O.Ms.No.110 dated 19.07.2019, the Government has brought into the existence the system of Village Accordingly, in the Secretariats in the Gram Panchayats in the State. Gurazala town, 1®* Ward Sachivalayam (for Ward Nos.2,3,9 & 10) and 2 Ward Sachivalayam (for Ward Nos. 1,18,19 & 20) were established in the centre of the town. While so, both the Sachivalayams were shifted to private buildings in the outskirts in Ward Nos. 10 and 17 respectively, in a hurried without any prior proceedings. He further submitted that due to the nd manner, said shifting, the residents especially the elderly, disabled and economically weaker sections may find it difficult to access the essential services which are meant for them. Accordingly, prayed for direction to the respondents to shift the Ward Sachivalayams to its prior location in the centre of the town. Perused the record and considered the submissions made by learned 4. counsel for the petitioner. 5. On close scrutiny of the submissions and the pleadings, it can be noticed that this writ petition is more in nature of political interest than public interest litigation. Moreover, it is the prerogative of the respondents as to where the ward sachivalayams are to be established. Further, the petitioner did not specify any rule position with regard to place or location where The issue is more purely of sachivalayams have to be established, administrative nature and it should be handled by the Executive and this Court cannot intervene in that regard. In view of the same, the petitioner has not % 3 made out valid point warranting the interference of this Court and the Public Interest Litigation is liable to the dismissed. Accordingly, the Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- G HELANAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / ,/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to Sri. Ghanta Sridhar Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 3. Two CCs to GP for Village and Ward Secretariats, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 4. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Admin and Urban Development, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. Two CD Copies GSC * HIGH COURT DATED:10/09/2025 ORDER WP(PIL) NO. 54 OF 2025 #• ml Curreni saciion FATC^I--^ i/O 2 3 SEP 2025 x: DISMISSING THE WP (PIL) WITHOUT COSTS