Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104523 (ALL)

TAHA AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34983/2025 · 2025-10-09

Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34983 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Ashutosh Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Roshan Kr. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed to enlarge the applicant on bail in case crime No. 14 of 2024 under Section 307, 34 IPC, Police station- Shahganj, District - Prayagraj. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated. He has a criminal history of one case which is also frictious in nature. It is further submitted that charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that specific role of causing knife injury has been assigned to the applicant and the injured received eleven injuries which is dangerous to life. 5. Considering the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account that specific role of causing knife injury has been assigned to the applicant who caused 11 injuries to the injured which are dangerous to life, this Court is not inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application is rejected. 7. Considering the fact that charge sheet has already been filed and three witnesses of fact have already been examined, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously. October 10, 2025 Vandana Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Taha Ahmad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad