Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104504 (MAD)

Jothimani v. The Superintendent of Police

WP Crl./933/2025 · 2025-09-25

N Sathish Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 Jothimani Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police Salem District, Salem. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Atthur Sub Division, Atthur, Salem District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Aathur Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. 4.Abinaya 5.Rajendran Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 PRAYER To direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action as against the respondents No.4 and 5 on the basis of Petitioner's representation dated 23.06.2025 forwarded to the 2nd respondent by the District Collector, Salem. For Appellant(s): Mr.K.Kannan For Respondent: Mr.R.Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate Crl. Side, for R1 to R3 ORDER The petitioner seeks direction to the respondent Police to take action against the respondents 4 and 5 on the basis of his representation dated 23.06.2025. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the fourth respondent is none other than the wife of his brother, namely, Dhanasekaran and she eloped with one Thirunavukkarasu leaving their 3 year old female child. Subsequently, the petitioner's brother and the gild child were missing. Hence, a complaint came to be registered in Crime No.210 of 2025. Subsequently, the fifth respondent also made a complaint against the petitioner's family in Crime No.241 of 2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 3. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the fourth respondent eloped with one Thirunavukkarasu leaving 3 year old female child and thereafter, they threatened the petitioner and his family members, hence he made a representation dated 23.06.2025 to take action against the respondents 4 and 5. 4. On perusal of the entire materials, it is seen that there is a case and counter case filed against the parties. Hence, investigation be conducted in both the FIRs and final report shall be filed. There is no need for any direction from this Court. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. 25-09-2025 pvs Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 To 1.The Superintendent of Police Salem District. Salem. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police Atthur Sub Division, Atthur, Salem District. 3.The Inspector of Police, Aathur Police Station, Aathur, Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 N.SATHISH KUMAR J. pvs WP Crl. No. 933 of 2025 25-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis