[2025:JHHC:22068] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2379 of 2025 Jemes Surin @ James Surin, Aged about 55 years, S/o Late Samuel Surin, R/o Village-Turbul, P.O. and P.S.-Kamdara, District-Gumla. ..... … Petitioner Versus Central Bureau of Investigation, through Senior Superintendent of Police, AHD, CBI, Ranchi ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. Prashant Pallav, D.S.G.I. ------ 05/ 06.08.2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned D.S.G.I. appearing for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with R.C.-05A/2012-AHD-R of 2012, registered for the offences under Sections 420, 423, 424, 467, 468, 469, 471, 477-A, 120-B, 109 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 13(2) read with Sections 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, pending in the court of learned AJC-XVIII-cum-Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi. 3. Mr. Lukesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered in compliance of the direction passed in one W.P.(PIL) with regard to the examination conducted by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission in the year 2003. He submits that the allegation is there against the petitioner that he has been provided 18 more marks by the interview board. He further submits that now the chargesheet has been submitted and in view that the petitioner may kindly be provided the privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Mr. Prashant Pallav, learned D.S.G.I. appearing for the CBI has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there [2025:JHHC:22068] -2- against the petitioner of obtaining 18 more marks by the interview board, in view that prayer for anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering the allegation that 18 more marks has been provided to the petitioner by the interview board and further the chargesheet has already been submitted and during the investigation, it appears that the petitioner has co-operated in the investigation that’s why the CBI has not arrested him, I am inclined to provide privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned AJC-XVIII-cum-Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi, in connection with R.C.-05A/2012-AHD-R of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-