Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104480 (PNJ)

SUMAN PURI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/56993/2024 · 2025-02-13

Manisha Batra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE H 292 SUMAN PURI STATE OF HA CORAM: HON Present : Mr Mr. Ms. MANISHA BAT This petitioner in cas Sections 406, 42 later on) at Police It is had been dismis ordered to be tak petition. The pr compromise has and a petition compromise had petition bearing N the ground that complied with by HE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of de URI Ver F HARYANA AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANI Mr. Kawalpreet Singh Virk, Advoca Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, D.A.G., Haryana an Ms. Payal Sharma, Advocate for resp **** A BATRA, J. (oral) This is the 3rd petition filed for gr in case bearing FIR No.118 dated 06, 420 and 506 of IPC (Sections 46 t Police Station Safidon, District Jind. It is submitted that her previous pet dismissed. Vide order dated 18.11.2 be taken against the present petition he present petition has been filed m se has been arrived at between the p tition seeking quashing of the afo se had also been pending. Today, v aring No. CRM-M-55717-2024 has be that the terms and conditions of th ith by the parties. AB AND HARYANA RH M No.56993 of 2024 e of decision: 13.02.2025 …. Petitioner Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA dvocate for the petitioners. and or respondent No.2. for grant of anticipatory bail to the dated 07.05.2024 registered under ons 467, 468 and 471 of IPC added Jind. us petitions making the same prayer 8.11.2024, no coercive steps were etitioner during the pendency of the filed mainly on the ground that a the petitioner and respondent No.2 e aforesaid FIR on the basis of day, vide separate order, the said has been dismissed as withdrawn on of the compromise have not been o the nder dded rayer were f the at a No.2 s of said n on been Jyoti 2025.02.14 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh CRM-M No.56 Lear petition as this s petition has been basing the pleas o Perm Acc liberty as prayed 13.02.2025 Jyoti-IV o.56993 of 2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner s this stage, with liberty to file afresh s been rendered infructuous due to the pleas only on the compromise. Permitted to do so. Accordingly, the present petition is rayed for. (M Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/N Whether reportable : Yes/N -2- oner seeks withdrawal of the present afresh by submitting that the instant to the reason that it was filed while tion is dismissed as withdrawn with (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE es/No. es/No esent stant hile with Jyoti 2025.02.14 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order Chandigarh