Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10447 (UTT)

DIPTI RAWAT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/413/2020 · 2025-06-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Subhash Upadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:4817-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSB/413/2020 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Kumar Nailwal, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Deepak Joshi, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes statement at the Bar that since petitioner has taken voluntarily retirement from service in the year 2021, therefore reliefs as claimed in this writ petition do not survive. 3. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.06.2025 Mahinder/