IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31068 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-456 Year-2024 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Soni Devi W/O Awadhesh Prasad R/O Vill.- Chapri, P.s.- Sirdalla, Dist.- Nawada. 2. Nitish Kumar S/O Vijay Prasad R/O Vill.- Chapri, P.s.- Sirdalla, Dist.- Nawada. 3. Upendra Prasad S/O Late Jagdish Prasad R/O Vill.- Chapri, P.s.- Sirdalla, Dist.- Nawada. 4. Ritesh Kumar S/O Upendra Prasad R/O Vill.- Chapri, P.s.- Sirdalla, Dist.- Nawada. 5. Lalita Devi W/O Upendra Prasad R/O Vill.- Chapri, P.s.- Sirdalla, Dist.- Nawada. ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms/Mrs. Madhuri Lata, A.P.P. Mr. M.M.Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 4 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(2), 190, 191(3),126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2) and 103(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per prosecution case, on account of dispute with regard to pathway, it is alleged that all the FIR named accused persons including these petitioners assaulted informant and his family members by means of Gadasa, tangi, lathi etc as a result of which Manoj Kumar, Bali Prasad and Naresh Prasad Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31068 of 2025(4) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 sustained injuries. Injury of Manoj Kumar was found to be grievous, while injured Naresh Prasad died during treatment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 5. Learned counsel for the State and the informant oppose the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the nature of accusation, prayer for bail of these petitioners is rejected. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T