Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104423 (ALL)

SANJU VERMA v. STATE OF U.P.

NA528/39353/2025 · 2025-10-09

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39353 of 2025 Court No. - 78 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed with the prayer to quash to quash the NBW dated 30.05.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, Gangster Act, Kanpur Nagar in Special Criminal Case No. 265 of 2018 arising out of Case Crime No. 86 of 2018 under Section 3(1) Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 pending in the Court of Special Judge, Gangster Act, Kanpur Nagar, P.S.- Naubasta, District- Kanpur Nagar. Further prayer has been made to stay the effect and operation of the aforesaid order. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that earlier the applicant had been granted bail by the competent court but subsequently for some unavoidable reasons he could not appear before the trial court. Hence non- bailable warrants have been issued against him. He further submits that the reasons on account of which the applicant failed to appear before the trial court is that he has been a victim of paralysis and the relevant medical papers have been appended with the affidavit along with this application and that the applicant has every intention to appear before the court concerned and participate in the trial. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the prayer. 5. In the last, learned counsel for the applicant has urged that direction for expeditious disposal of the bail application of the applicant be given. 6. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant and perused the impugned order as well as the other materials brought on record. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradip Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanju Verma .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall appear before the Court concerned and apply for bail within thirty days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the Court concerned in accordance with law. For a period of thirty days from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. 7. It is made clear that no further time shall be allowed to the applicant to surrender and apply for bail before the Court concerned. 8. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. October 10, 2025 Fhd NA528 No. 39353 of 2025 2 (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad