[2025:RJ-JP:11564] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3772/2025 Kanha S/o Jagdish, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Anand Colony, Police Station Kotwali, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. H.S. Bikarwar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.10/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bharatpur, District Bharatpur for the offences under Sections 304(2), 112(2), 307 & 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (in short ‘BNS’), 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that as per the allegations, petitioner was searched accidentally and he was found in possession of 1 Apple iphone, 8 Android cell phones and two keypad mobile phones. It is submitted that petitioner failed to produce the bills of mobile phones. He submits that co-accused person of this case namely- Pawan has been granted benefit of bail by this Court. It is [2025:RJ-JP:11564] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3772/2025] contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that one other case has also been registered against the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Kanha S/o Jagdish shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/724