1. On the grievance made by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner that respondent-authorities have failed to conclude the proceedings in terms of Section 74 (6) of CGST Act, 2017, we had vide order dated 29.10.2025 directed the STO concerned to appear in person along with the relevant record on the next date of hearing. Serial No. 15 REGULAR CAUSE LIST HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 157/2024 CM(276/2024) HOTEL AHDOOS PRIVATE LIMITED …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. A.H. Naik, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Shabir Ahmad, Advocate & Ms. Beenish, Advocate Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI with Ms. Rehana, Advocate CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Kumar, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Parihar, Judge. ORDER 11.11.2025 Nuzhat Shafi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 12.11.2025 13:34 2. In response to the order dated 29.10.2025, Ms. Ankita Gupta- Deputy Director, DGGI, Regional Unit, Jammu has appeared through Virtual Mode. 3. Mr. T.M. Shamsi, learned DSGI, has also passed on a copy of the communication dated 16.04.2025, issued by the Senior Intelligence Officer DGGI, Jammu Regional Unit, a perusal whereof indicates that the proceedings against the petitioner have been concluded by the competent authority in terms of provisions of Section 74(6) CGST Act, 2017. Copy of the communication is taken on record. 4. In view of the aforesaid development there remains nothing in this petition to be adjudicated upon. 5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law against the communication in case the petitioner is aggrieved 5. Dismissed. (Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge SRINAGAR: 11.11.2025 “S.NUZHAT” Nuzhat Shafi I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 12.11.2025 13:34