Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
138
Dalip Singh
Rajesh Kumar
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Jagraj Singh Khiva raised by the Registry on
Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel party, who filed it, to re However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on INCOMP No.482-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
INCOMP No. 4
DIARY No.1034
Date of decision : Dalip Singh Versus Rajesh Kumar
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
None. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) The aforesaid petition was filed on Jagraj Singh Khiva, Advocate. However, certain objections were raised by the Registry on 12.11.2024. As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by the counsel party, who filed it, to re-file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on
"All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in the Objection
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 482 of 2025 10340582 Date of decision :-24.03.2025 …..Petitioner …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The aforesaid petition was filed on 12.11.2024 by Mr. , Advocate. However, certain objections were As per Rule 9, Chapter I, Part-A, Volume V, Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules and Orders, the petition, on which objections have been raised by the Registry is to be taken back by file within a period of 40 days. However, the same was not taken back for refiling after removal of objections. On failure, the case is to be listed before the Court for orders. Following note was displayed/published by the Registry in the causelist and website of this Hon'ble Court on 14.01.2025:-
"All the Advocates/Parties are requested to collect the cases as mentioned in the list attached below which are lying pending in the Objection VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.28 19.07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Advocate to collect his case for re objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. further order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the records.
March 24, 2025 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
INCOMP No.482-2025 Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication of this notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate orders." Even after the publication of the note requesting the Advocate to collect his case for re-filing after re objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no
order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the March 24, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 Counter of DRR Branch and not taken back till today, within one month of the date of publication is notice, failing which all the cases (except the Caveat Applications) will be listed before Hon'ble Court on judicial side for appropriate Even after the publication of the note requesting the filing after rectification of objections, the needful was not done. Consequently, the matter has been listed before this Court in urgent list today. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts of the matter, no
order is required to be passed. The file be consigned to the
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.03.28 19.07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document