Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104401 (PNJ)

N K BAJAJ v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/30798/2024 · 2025-01-17

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105/2 IN T N.K.Bajaj State of Haryana CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. K *** TRIBHUVAN D CM No.496 of 20 2. of hearing of the m Main Case the instant petitio revision of pay judgment dated 1 titled K.L. Vasude has attained finali v. K.L. Vasudeva IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CWP-30798-2024 Date of Decision Versus ryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBH Mr. Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate f Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A *** AN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) 6 of 2025 Application is allowed. For the reasons stated in the appl f the main case is advanced to today i Learned counsel for the petitione petition is for re-fixation of the petitio pay-scales. The issue stands decide ated 16.05.2023 rendered in Civil W sudeva and others v. State of Harya finality as LPA No.1960 of 2023 title eva and others, filed against it, also NJAB AND HARYANA 2024 (O&M) cision : 17.01.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents RIBHUVAN DAHIYA ocate for the petitioner. ional Advocate General, Haryana. e application, it is allowed. The date oday itself, and is taken on Board. titioner contends that claim raised in petitioner’s pension on the basis of decided in petitioner’s favour vide ivil Writ Petition No.26015 of 2013 aryana and another. The judgment 23 titled State of Haryana and others t, also stands dismissed. date ed in is of vide 2013 ment ers PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.20 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-30798-2024 2. considered as pe hereinabove, and due benefits, as f thereafter. 3. counsel for the pe terms thereof. 4. 5. officer concerned January 17, 2025 ps 2024 (O&M) -2- Learned State counsel contends th as per law laid down by this Court e, and an appropriate order will be pa ts, as found admissible, will be relea In view of the statement made by the petitioner has no objection to the Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed w cerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to th , 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable ends that the petitioner’s case will be Court in the judgments mentioned l be passed within two months. The released to him within two weeks ade by learned State counsel, learned to the petition being disposed of in sed within the stipulated period, the 0 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ill be oned The eeks rned of in , the YA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.01.20 14:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document