IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 125 Rajbir Singh Kadian Viveka Nand Jha and others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate (petitioner himself) which was approved by the Registry on 13.11.2025. As per office note, after such approval, it is mandatory for the petitioner or learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard Registry within one month, as p Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly approved by Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, the petitioner has not furnished the hard copy of the petition. petition bearing No.CR Civil Revision No.9457-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.9457 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision : Rajbir Singh Kadian Versus Viveka Nand Jha and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Office note perused. The present revision petition has been filed by Sh. Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate (petitioner himself) which was approved by the Registry on 13.11.2025. As per office note, after such approval, it is mandatory for the petitioner or learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard Registry within one month, as per decision of the Hon’ble Computer Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly approved by Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, the petitioner has not furnished the hard copy of the petition. It has further been reported that another revisi petition bearing No.CR-7192-2024 on the same cause of action 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ivil Revision No.9457 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-20.04.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The present revision petition has been filed by Sh. Rajbir Singh Kadian, Advocate (petitioner himself) through e-filing which was approved by the Registry on 13.11.2025. As per office note, after such approval, it is mandatory for the petitioner or learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard-copy of the petition in the er decision of the Hon’ble Computer Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly approved by Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, the petitioner has not It has further been reported that another revision 2024 on the same cause of action VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 19.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document challenging the same impugned order dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner is pending adjudication at serial No. of the ordinary/motion list. despite the case having been called twice. dismissed, decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. April 20, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No Civil Revision No.9457-2025 challenging the same impugned order dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure 2) filed by the petitioner is pending adjudication at serial No. of the ordinary/motion list. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. In view of the facts noted above, the present petition is dismissed, being duplicate petition as well as for non decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. , 2026 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 challenging the same impugned order dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure 2) filed by the petitioner is pending adjudication at serial No. 235 on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called twice. In view of the facts noted above, the present petition is being duplicate petition as well as for non-compliance of decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.27 19.44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document