Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104362 (MAD)

SURIYA v. The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/25865/2025 · 2025-09-19

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 SURIYA Petitioner(s) Vs The Inspector of Police, P3 Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai. (Cr.No.257/2025) Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS, praying to enlarge the petitioner on Anticipatory Bail in the event of her arrest for alleged offences under section 8(c) r/w 20 (b)(ii)(B) and 29(1) of NDPS act in Crime No. 257/2025 on the file of the Respondent, The Inspector of Police, P3, Vyasarpadi police Station, Chennai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Gowri Shankar I For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Udayakumar Government Advocate Crl.side https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) and Section 29(1) of NDPS Act 1985 in Crime No.257 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 10.630 kgs of Ganja. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and she has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against her. He submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner is sought to be implicated based on the confession of the co-accused. He further submitted that she will abide by any condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would vehemently oppose stating that the petitioner was illegally found in possession of 10.630 kgs of Ganja. He would further submit that the petitioner has got one previous case to her credit. 5. Taking into account the nature offence and the fact that the contraband involved in this case is a huge quantity and considering the bad antecedent, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 19-09-2025 gbi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 To 1.The Inspector of Police, P3 Vyasarpadi Police Station, Chennai. (Cr.No.257/2025) 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 25865 of 2025 19-09-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis