1 2025:CGHC:9811 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1093 of 2025 1 - Jitendra Yadav S/o Ambika Yadav Aged About 34 Years R/o House No. 552 Shankar Nagar Chhawani District Durg (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Durg District Durg (C.G.) 3 - The Sub Divisional OfÏcer (R) Bhilai 3, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Sub Registrar Bhilai 3 District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.01 17:43:19 +0530 2 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Priya Sharma, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Ritesh Giri, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 27.02.2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner who is the owner of land bearing Survey no. 544/1, 581/8, 580/2 and 618/12 total area 135.75 decimel, situated at P.H. No. 00001 village Jamul Tehsil Bhilai- III District Durg (C.G.), seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to sale the land owned by the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not making any illegal plotting on the land, however, the petitioner wish to sale the land owned by him within the permissible limit. 3. Learned counsel for the State, on instructions, would submit that if the petitioner wish to sell the land within permissible limit, then the State has no objection to the contention of the petitioner and he may sell the land owned by him within permissible limit of land transactions without any plotting. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Perusal of the pleadings and documents, it is evident that the order of restriction of sale has been imposed by the authorities only to prevent illegal plotting. Since, the petitioner is stating that the petitioner wish to sell the total land owned by him within permissible 3 limit of land transactions, there is nothing left to adjudicate, at this stage and it is directed that the petitioner be permitted to sell his land without making any illegal plotting within permissible limit of land transactions. The petitioner is directed to intimate the concerned authorities at the time of sale of land. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib