Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10433 (ALL)

SATYENDRA PRAKASH SINGH CHANDEL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/22639/2009 · 2025-07-06

Prashant Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:106454 Court No. - 79 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22639 of 2009 Applicant :- Satyendra Prakash Singh Chandel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- P.S. Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Poonam Srivastava Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J. 1. None appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application even in the revised reading of cause list. 2. The instant applicant has been filed way back in the year 2009. It appears that by efflux of time either the applicant has lost interest in the matter or the instant application has rendered infructuous, and that is why no one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application. 3. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. However, in case the cause for filing the instant application is still surviving, the applicant will be at liberty to file restoration application in the instant matter. 5. Registrar (Compliance) is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial court, so that the trial may proceed on. Order Date :- 7.7.2025 Manish Himwan Digitally signed by :- MANISH HIMWAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad