Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104323 (ALL)

VIPIN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. State of U.P. AND ANOTHER

A482/34609/2024 · 2025-09-24

Saurabh Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34609 of 2024 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 2097 of 2021 arising out of Case Crime No.0057 of 2021 (State vs. Shailendra Kumar and others) under Section 420 IPC r/w Section 66(C) I.T. Act, Police Station - Karhal, District Mainpuri as well as charge sheet dated 05.06.2021 and cognizance order dated 26.07.2021. 3. On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order alongwith chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order along with chargesheet and entire criminal proceedings of the said case, can be set aside. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Lastly, learned counsel for applicants submitted that liberty may be granted to applicants to surrender before the court concerned and apply for bail to which learned AGA has no objection. 6. In view of the aforesaid, the instant application is finally disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that in case, the applicant surrenders before the court concerned within a period of three weeks from today and apply for bail, their bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law laid down in the case Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Himanshu Mishra, Priyadarshini Shandilya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vipin Kumar And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022 SCC OnLine SC 825). 7. However, it is made clear that till three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against applicants herein in pursuance of aforesaid case. September 25, 2025 Rakesh A482 No. 34609 of 2024 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad