Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104306 (ALL)

SAUD @ SAUD AHAMAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/22908/2025 · 2025-10-08

Prashant Mishra I, Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22908 of 2025 Court No. - 46 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the petitioner is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for State- respondents. The present writ petition has been preferred with the prayer to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 29.09.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 0207 of 2025 under sections- 109(1) BNS and, Section 3/25 Arms Act, 1959, Police Station- Utraon, District - Nagar (Commissionerate Prayagraj) and for a direction to the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in pursuance of impugned First Information Report. With regard to the allegations made in the F.I.R., investigating officer of the police is investigating the matter. The implication of petitioner is under Section 109 B.N.S. Causing injury or not causing the same is not relevant. Intention to cause the murder is relevant. Intention of the petitioner was only to evade arrest by the police and they fired only to frighten the police. For implication under Section 109 B.N.S., intention forms necessary ingredient of offence in any particular case. It necessarily precedes the act and should be discernible from the allegations on record, which is lacking in this case. After hearing the rival contentions, totality of facts and circumstances of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Zainul Abdin Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Saud @ Saud Ahamad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) this case and in view of the judgment passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Writ petition No. 7463/2024 (Shobhit Nehra Vs. State of U.P.), the above noted writ petition is disposed of directing the investigating officer to conclude the investigation of this case within period of 60 days. During the period of investigation and till cognizance is taken on the police report by the court concerned, the petitioner/petitioners shall not be arrested. In case of non-cooperation with the police investigation by the petitioner/petitioners, it shall be open for either of the respondents to file recall application of this order. October 9, 2025 Saurabh CRLP No. 22908 of 2025 2 (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) (Siddharth,J.) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad