Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15285 of 2025 Court No. - 34
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Vikas Chandra Tiwari, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Vijay Lal, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was working on the post of Head Constable and he was superannuated on 31.07.2024, however, there happens to be certain discrepancy with regard to nominee, as according to the writ petitioner, Kiran Devi was wrongly incorporated in place of Kiran Mishra and an affidavit to the said extent was also submitted. However, the writ petitioner has not been paid the pensionary benefits.
3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the writ petitioner for payment of pension.
4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that the claim of the writ petitioner needs to be examined at the first instance by the second respondent/ Police Commissioner (Headquarter), Police Commissionerate, Lucknow.
5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before second respondent/ Police Commissioner (Headquarter), Police Commissionerate, Lucknow by 27.10.2025, who shall Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Pandey, Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Anil Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
thereafter proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. October 10, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15285 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad