Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10427 (AP)

VURAGAYALA RAKESH REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/11053/2025 · 2025-09-03

K Sreenivasa Reddy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010119262025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 11053/2025 Between: Vuragayala Rakesh Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA ASHOK KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 Order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayer; “….pleased to pass an order to issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 for not releasing the remaining amount Rs.16,225/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Five only) for the academic year 2018-2019 which is payable to the petitioner towards tuition fees reimbursement under the Jnanabhumi (RTF) scheme for the academic years 2015-2019 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust and contrary to G.O.Ms.No.66, dated 08.09.2010 of Social Welfare (SW.EDN.2) Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, besides being violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents herein to forthwith release the remaining amount Rs.16,225/- (Rupees Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Five only) towards the tuition fees reimbursement under Jnanabhumi RTF Scheme to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _______________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:04.09.2025 ARB 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.11053 of 2025 Date:04.09.2025 ARB