HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15291 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. On the oral request of learned counsel for the writ petitioner, he is permitted to implead Land Management Commissioner (Accounts), Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Anubhag-14 Accountant, Lucknow, U.P. as Respondent no.7 during the course of the day. 2. Heard Sri Mayank Srivastava holding brief of Mohd. Afzal, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, Sri R.S. Umrao, learned Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Jagdish Pathak, learned counsel for Respondent no.2. 3. The case of the writ petitioner is that he happens to be an Ex-Army man, who had served the Indian Army for more than 17 years and he was discharged on 01.11.2004 and thereafter he was accorded accorded appointment as Lekhpal on 25.06.2016. According to the writ petitioner, he is entitled to the benefits, which flow from the Government Order dated 16.09.2011 and 25.11.2011, relatable to the coverage of the writ petitioner under the Old Pension Scheme. Submission is that the writ petitioner has already corresponded before the authority, but no orders considering the claim of the writ petitioner have been passed. 4. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to allot General Provident Fund account number to thewrit petitioner in Old Pension Scheme, in terms of the Government Order dated 16.9.2011 and 25.11.2011. 5. Learned Standing Counsel as well as the counsel appearing for Respondent no.2 on the other hand submit that the claim of the writ petitioner needs to be decided at the first instance by the seventh respondent, Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohd. Afzal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jagdish Pathak Pramod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) before whom the matter is pending and in this regard, he has invited attention of the Court towards page-29 of the paper-book. According to them the writ petitioner has to approach the said authority for ventilation of the grievance. 6. The said submission has been gracefully accepted by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 7. Considering the over all fact situation and bearing in mind the fact that the matter is pending before the seventh respondent, thus for facilitation and early disposal, the writ petitioner may prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.7, who shall thereafter proceed to examine the claim of the writ petitioner, an in case the inputs are required, same be furnished while putting to notice the writ petitioner also and thereafter, an order be passed within a period of three months. October 10, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15291 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad