Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10426 (AP)

Adapala Madhavilatha, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7321/2020 · 2025-09-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010117922020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7321/2020 Between: 1. ADAPALA MADHAVILATHA,, W/O. NIRMAL BABU, AGED 41 YEARS, R/O. FLAT.NO.405, GOLDEN PLAZA, RAITHUPETA, NANDIGAMA TOWN AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, NANDIGAMA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDIGAMA POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the compliant dated 25 06 2018 made by the petitioner except the registering FIR.No.178 2018, dated 25.06.2018 under Sec. 306 of IPC as bad, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to investigate and complete the enquiry on the FIR.No.178/2018, dated 25.06.2018 and grant IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to complete the process of investigation basing on the FIR.No.178/2018, dated: 25.06.2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7321 of 2020 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not taking action on the compliant dated 25.06.2018 made by the petitioner except the registering FIR No.178/2018 dated 25.06.2018 under Sec 306 of IPC as bad illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to investigate and complete the enquiry on the FIR No.178/2018 dated 25.06.2018 and grant and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 10th September, 2025 RKS