Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10426 (ALL)

KANTA PRASAD v. State of UP Others

CRLR/175/2024 · 2025-09-15

Harvir Singh

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 175 of 2024 Court No. - 93 HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and perused the material on record. 2. The revisionist herein has challenged the order dated 23.11.2023 passed by learned Special Judge SC/ST Act, Pilibhit, in Case Crime No. 0543 of 2022, under Sections 420, 406 IPC and 3(1)Da, 3(1)Dha, 3(2)(Va) of SC/ST Act, Police Station Kotwali, District Pilibhit in Criminal Case No. 599 of 2023, by which the protest petition of the revisionist has been dismissed. 3. From a bare reading of F.I.R. dated 06.10.2022, apart from the Sections 420, 406 of IPC, the relevant section under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 have also been levelled. 4. In the event of any order passed by the Sessions Judge, where allegations in respect of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act have been levelled, then an appeal not the revision shall lie under Section 14-A of the said Act. 5. Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw this revision with liberty to file an appeal under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 6. In view of the above, the instant revision is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. Certified copy of the documents be returned to learned counsel for the revisionist as per Rules. September 16, 2025 Vikram Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Atul Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Bahadur Singh (Harvir Singh,J.) Kanta Prasad .....Revisionist(s) State Of Up Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad