Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104255 (ALL)

DR. RATNAKAR v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/35559/2025 · 2025-10-09

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35559 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following reliefs: " (1) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the Respondents/ Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun situated at Saharanpur to decide the Impleadment Application for impleadment of the Petitioner namely Dr. Ratnakar S/o Jagdish Singh Kushwaha R/o Near Mother Dairy, C-100 A, Ganesh Nagar, Pandav Nagar Complex, East Delhi-110092,as a necessary and proper party of S.A. No. 15 of 2025 pending before Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun situated at Saharanpur; (ii) Issue a suitable order or direction to the court below to decide the S.A. No. 15 of 2025, M/S Pooja Shop Factory Vs. Panjab National Bank & Others Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act; which is pending in Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun situated at Saharanpur within stipulated period without any unnecessary adjournment; otherwise the petitioners will suffer grave irreparable loss and injury." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for impleadment is pending since 27.07.2025. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sanjai Singh Dr. Ratnakar .....Petitioner(s) Punjab National Bank And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Dehradun situated at Saharanpur to consider and decide the aforementioned impleadment application, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. 6. This order has been passed in presence of Sri Sanjai Singh, learned counsel for respondent No. 1. October 10, 2025 Nitika Sri. WRIC No. 35559 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad