Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104243 (MAD)

RAGAVENDRA RAJA v. The State Rep by, The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/25782/2025 · 2025-09-19

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.25782 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.25782 of 2025 Ragavendra Raja ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State rep. by, The Inspector of Police, P-6 Kodungaiyur Police Station, Chennai (Crime No.369 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to grant bail to the petitioner/accused in Crime No.369 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S. Mohan Raj For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ******* 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25782 of 2025 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.07.2025, for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 103(1) of BNS Act in Crime No.369 of 2025, registered on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity the petitioner joined hands with other accused and brutally attacked the son of the defacto complainant and caused his death. Hence, this case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is friend of the deceased and he was staying with him. At that time all the accused persons attacked the deceased and seeing the same he ran away from the place. As the deceased was not able to run away from the place, all the accused persons attacked the deceased and caused the death. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and sought for bail to the petitioner. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25782 of 2025 4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent while opposing the bail to the petitioner, reiterated the prosecution case and states that the petitioner has no previous cases. He further submitted that the investigation is pending and this Court has dismissed the bail application for the co-accused in Crl.O.P.No.24922 of 2025 on 12.09.2025. 5. Considering the facts, gravity of offence and the fact that this Court had dismissed the bail application for the co-accused this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 19.09.2025 smn To 1. The Inspector of Police, P-6 Kodungaiyur Police Station, Chennai 2. The X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.25782 of 2025 K. RAJASEKAR, J. smn Crl.O.P. No.25782 of 2025 19.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis