Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104233 (ALL)

SMT. SUNDHRA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/35535/2025 · 2025-10-09

Arun Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35535 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Sandeep Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Mohan Singh Parmar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5. 2. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the order dated 20.09.2025 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Goverdhan, Mathura suspending the fair price shop's license of the petitioner. 3. A preliminary objection has been raised by the learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of filing an Appeal under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities Distribution Act, 2016. 4. I find substance in the submission made by the learned Standing Counsel. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts, the writ petition stands disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to avail an alternative remedy by filing an appeal under Section 13(1) of the U.P. Essential Commodities Distribution Act, 2016 against the impugned order. October 10, 2025 M.S. Ansari Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Arun Kumar,J.) Smt. Sundhra Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD SAQIB ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad