2025:JHHC:12901 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.918 of 2004 ----- Sanjay Kumar Bajla, S/o Late Ramdeo Bajla, resident of Bajla Niwas, Caistairs Town, B- Deoghar, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 3. The Manager, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 4. The Certificate Officer, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 5. The State of Jharkhand. 6. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar. 7. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Deoghar. 8. The Officer-in-charge, Deoghar Thana, Deoghar. .......... Respondents. With W.P.(C) No.2787 of 2003 ----- Vijoy Kumar Bajla, S/o Late Madanlal Bajla, resident of Bajla Niwas, Caster Town, P.O. & P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 2. The Managing Director, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 3. The Manager, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 4. The Certificate Officer, Bihar State Credit & Investment Corporation Ltd., Indira Bhawan, 4th Floor, Patna-800001. 5. State of Jharkhand. 6. Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar. 7. Senior Superintendent of Police, Deoghar. 8. Officer-in-charge, Deoghar Thana, Deoghar. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner(s): None For Res. Nos.1 to 4 : Mr. A. K. Das, Advocate For Res. Nos.5 to 8 : Mr. Suresh Kumar, S.C. (L&C)-II ----- Order No.08 Date: 30.04.2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners. 2025:JHHC:12901 2 2. Mr. A. K. Das, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos.1 to 4 submits that the present writ petitions have become infructuous. 3. Considering the said submission, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sanjay/