HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 34648 of 2024 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State perused the record. 2. This application has been filed by the applicants to quash the entire proceeding including charge sheet dated 02.05.2017, Charge sheet No.103 of 2017 alongwith cognizance order dated 11.09.2022 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit as well as entire criminal proceeding of Case No.8322 of 2020 (State vs. Siyaram & others) arising out of Case Crime No.131 of 2017, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 332, 186, 325 IPC and 31(A) Crl. Law Amendment Act and 9/51 Prevention of Wild Life Animal Act 1951, P.S. Madhotanda, District Pilibhit pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that they relinquish the prayer for quashment and wish to move bail application before the trial court in view of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, (2021) 10 SCC 773. 4. Accordingly, the prayer sought through the instant application, is refused. 5. Considering the above submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that in case the applicants appear before the court concerned within three weeks from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in terms of the guidelines/observations given by Hon'ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil (supra). 6. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Rajpoot, Shiv Nayan Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Siyaram And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. It is made clear that in the event no such application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants. 8. With the above direction, the instant application under Section 428 Cr.P.C is finally disposed of. However, it is made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of entire proceedings. September 11, 2025 Rakesh A482 No. 34648 of 2024 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad