ANIL KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/35349/2025 · 2025-10-07
Y K Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104199 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104199 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35349 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary Affidavit filed today in Court today is taken on record. Heard Sri Raj Narayan Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents and Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, learned counsel representing the respondent-Gram Sabha. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent No. 2, the Additional District Magistrate (Judicial), District Gautam Budh Nagar, to decide the Restoration Application dated 1.6.2025 and 23.6.2025 filed by the petitioners seeking recall of orders dated 11.7.2024 and 11.6.2025, passed in Case No. D202211270000244/2025, [Anil Kumar and Others Vs. State], under Sections 30/32/38 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously and within a stipulated time period. Counsel for the petitioner has referred to the 'order sheet' of the case, a copy whereof has been appended to the writ petition and also to the supplementary affidavit, to point out that although several dates have been fixed but for some reason or the other, matter has been adjourned and the delay in disposal of the case is causing undue hardship to the petitioner. Accordingly, a prayer is made for a direction to the court/authority concerned to conclude the proceedings at an early date. Counsel for the State respondents has no objection if the proceedings are expedited. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Narayan Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sunil Kumar Singh Anil Kumar Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Having regard to the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of with an observation that the court/authority concerned would make an endeavor to conclude the proceedings of the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months, without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, provided there is no other legal impediment. October 8, 2025 Arun K. Singh WRIC No. 35349 of 2025 2 (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad