Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10419 (UTT)

SACHIN KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1680/2022 · 2025-07-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.1744 of 2022 With WPCRL No.1680 of 2022 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. There is no representation for the petitioner(s) as well as for the Caveator. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a final report dated 26.03.2025 has been submitted in favour of the petitioner(s). 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition(s). 5. Accordingly, writ petition(s) is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.07.2025 SK