Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25923 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16174 of 2024 Petitioner :- Narendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State- respondents. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following relief:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus and direct to respondent no. 1 to consider the claim of petitioner and provide the pension to the petitioner after including the un regularize service of the petitioner accordance with law." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representations dated 01.07.2024 and 03.09.2024 before respondent No 1, but no decision has been taken till date. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No 1 to decide the representation within a stipulated time. 4. Learned standing counsel submitted that concerned authority is respondent No. 2, therefore, petitioner may be directed to file fresh representation before respondent No. 2. He further submitted that in case any such representation is filed, the same shall be considered and decided at the earliest. 5. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to petitioner to move fresh representation along with certified copy of this order before respondent No. 2 within two weeks. In case any such representation is filed, respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the same in accordance with law maximum within a period of eight weeks thereafter. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. Order Date :- 24.2.2025 ADY Digitally signed by :- AMAR DEEP YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad