Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104168 (ALL)

RAKESH RAJBHAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/35407/2025 · 2025-10-08

Arun Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35407 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State authorities and learned counsel for the respondent Bank. 2. It is stated that petitioner has taken loan for agricultural purposes but the same could not be repaid as per the terms of agreement. A recovery citation dated 19.09.2025 for a sum of Rs. 7,35,000/- plus other charges has been issued against the petitioner. This writ petition has been filed with the averment that petitioner is ready and willing to deposit the amount, in case the petitioner is permitted to do so in easy installments. 3. Ms. Smriti Gupta, holding brief of Shri Ramesh Kumar Shukla, l earned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank has no objection if this Court is permitted the petitioner to deposit the amount in installments. 4. Having regard to the fact that petitioner has offered to pay the entire amount due against him, in my view, the ends of justice require that the petitioner be granted opportunity to deposit the entire outstanding amount due against him in the following manner: (i) The respondent Bank shall provide a fresh schedule for repayment of outstanding amount in twelve equal monthly installments. (ii) The first monthly installment shall be deposited by the petitioner by 10th November, 2025. (ii) No other charges, if any, shall be recovered from the petitioner by the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajeet Kumar Shukla, Sarvesh Kant Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ramesh Kumar Shukla Rakesh Rajbhar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent authorities/Bank. (iii) During the period of deposit of installments, the recovery proceedings will be kept in abeyance. In case the petitioner defaults in depositing installments within the stipulated period, it will be open for the respondents to start recovery proceedings against the petitioner. 5. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 9, 2025 Ashok Kr. WRIC No. 35407 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad