Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10416 (JHR)

DHARAMENDRA SINGH ALIAS DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3075/2025 · 2025-08-12

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:23282) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3050 of 2025 Rakesh Thakur, aged about 24 years, S/o Surrender Thakur, R/o village- Goraiyathan, P.O. + P.S.- Naudihabazar, District- Palamau, Jarkhand. … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party WITH B.A. No. 3075 of 2025 Dharamendra Singh @ Dharamendra Kumar Singh, aged about 24 years, S/o Lakhan Singh, R/o village- Goraiyathan, P.O. + P.S.- Naudihabazar, District- Palamau, Jharkhand … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. --- 03/12.08.2025 Both these Bail Applications arise out of same police case. Accordingly, both these bail applications are being disposed of by a common order. Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Naudiha Bazar P.S. Case No. 16 of 2024, POCSO Case No.42 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 376DB of the I.P.C. and Sections 4 & 6 of the POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Special Court of POCSO, Palamau. On 03.04.2024 at about 3:30 A.M., the petitioners are alleged to have committed gang rape 11 years old daughter of the informant. Considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, their prayer for bail stands rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-