IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 122 VISHAL STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present: Mr. Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, Haryana. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the raid could not have been conducted below the rank of the Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, considered. He having not submitted a representation petition to submit decided in a time bound manner. 2. Learned 3. Ordered accordingly. However, representation within a period of decided within 4 weeks thereafter 26.09.2025 ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: 26.09.2025 Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Munish Behl, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. BS Saroha, DAG, Haryana. *** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the raid could not conducted below the rank of the Gazetted Offi the Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, He having not submitted a representation petition to submit the same to respondent N decided in a time bound manner. earned State counsel has no objection to th Ordered accordingly. However, representation within a period of 2 weeks, the same shall be considered and within 4 weeks thereafter, in accordance with law ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M-54559-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 26.09.2025 ..Petitioner ..Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY , Advocate for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the raid could not Gazetted Officer, as per Section 9 of the Haryana Prevention of Public Gambling Act, 2025, which requires to be He having not submitted a representation, prays for withdrawal of the No.2, which may be directed to be has no objection to the limited prayer made Ordered accordingly. However, in case petitioner submits weeks, the same shall be considered and , in accordance with law. ( AMAN CHAUDHARY ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the raid could not as per Section 9 of which requires to be prays for withdrawal of the which may be directed to be limited prayer made. s a weeks, the same shall be considered and ASHOK KUMAR 2025.09.26 16:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document