Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10412 (RAJ)

PRADEEP SINGH v. SECRETARY UNION OF INDIA ORS

CW/15066/2012 · 2025-09-09

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36316] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15066/2012 Pradeep Singh S/o Late Shri Dayanand Singh 167 Bn CRPF age about 22 years, R/o Village Gopipatiyawa, Tehsil- Reghunathpura, District- Siwan (Bihar) Present address C/o Rajendra Kumar Kushwaha, Plot No.26, Trupati Nagar, Charannadi-IInd Narika Phatak, Murlipura, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary, Union of India M.H.A. New Delhi-01. 2. Director General CRPF CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-03. 3. Inspector General N/S CRPF R.K. Puram New Delhi-66 4. Dy Inspector General CRPF greater Noida (UP) 201301. 5. Commandant 167 Bn (through D.G. CRPF CGO Complex Lodhi Road, New Delhi-03. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.R. Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Parag Rastogi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 09/09/2025 1. By way of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for a direction against the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground in place of his deceased father on the post of Head Constable. 2. It has been informed by learned counsel for the petitioner that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has been appointed on compassionate ground on the post of Constable in the year 2015 and since then he is continuing on the said post. [2025:RJ-JP:36316] (2 of 2) [CW-15066/2012] 3. It is a settled proposition of law that compassionate appointment is not a regular source of recruitment and is a concession extended by the respondent-Government in order to tide over the financial crisis occurred on account of death of sole bread earner. 4. In the instant case, where petitioner has already been appointed on the post of Constable on compassionate ground, there is no scope for interference in the instant writ petition filed by the petitioner, and the same is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /31