Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10412 (AP)

Mr.Vankayala Lakshmi Narayan, S/o Late Sri V.Lakshmi Kotaiah v. The Government of A.P.

WP/27135/2013 · 2025-07-20

B S Bhanumathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 BSB, J W.P.No. 27135 of 2013 APHC010118092013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Monday, the Twenty First Day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Five Present The Honourable Ms. Justice B.S.Bhanumathi Writ Petition No: 27135 of 2013 Between: 1. Mr.Vankayala Lakshmi Narayana, S/o Late Sri V.Lakshmi Kotaiah, Aged about 60 years, R/o Machavaram Village and Mandal, Guntur Dist. ...Petitioner and 1. The Government of A.P, Rep/its Principal Secretary, Agril & Cooperation Dept. Secretariat Building, Hyderabad. 2. The Commissioner Director of Agril. Marketing, Govt. of A.P. Hyderabad. ...Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Koona Reddy Anji Reddy Counsel for the respondents: G.P for Agriculture 2 BSB, J W.P.No. 27135 of 2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking the following relief: “…to issue direction more particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring illegal action of the respondents not extending term of the Petitioner as chairman of the Agricultural market committee piduguralla Guntur District inspite of having recommendation of 2nd respondents herein and direction of the this Hon’ble Court in Writ petition No.25913 of 2013 and issuing G.O.Rt.No.1160 of dt.11.09.2013 by constituting new committee is illegal arbitrary and violation Article 14 of Indian Constitution and Sec 6, 12 of the A.P.Agri Products and live stock markets Act 1966 and consequently direct the respondents to set aside order in G.O.R.T No.1160 dt.11.09.2013 and to extend the tenure of the present committee as recommended by 2nd respondents herein and pass …” 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. 3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader representing the respondents and Sri G.Rajeswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Agriculture Market Committee submitted that as per the G.O.R.T No.1160 dated 11.09.2013, which was challenged in this writ petition, the committee was in force only till 17.09.2016, 3 BSB, J W.P.No. 27135 of 2013 as it has a tenure of three (03) years from 18.09.2013 and therefore, the relief in the writ petition has become infructuous. A copy of G.O.R.T No.1160 dated 11.09.2013 was enclosed to the writ petition. 4. Perused the same. 5. Apparently, the relief sought in the writ petition has become infructuous. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI Dated: 21.07.2025 KKV 4 BSB, J W.P.No. 27135 of 2013 41 THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B.S.BHANUMATHI Writ Petition No:27135 of 2013 Dated :21.07.2025 KKV