KRISHAN CHANDRA YADAV AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/39112/2025 · 2025-10-07
Deepak Verma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104116 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 104116 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39112 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
3. The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
4. Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicant as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record. October 8, 2025 Meenu Singh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Atmaram Nadiwal, Dinesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Krishan Chandra Yadav And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad