W.P.No.36259 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 24.09.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.No.36259 of 2025 R.Rajednran ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector Kallakurichi 2. The District Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Rdo Office, Kallakurichi 4. The Tashildar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner-s representation dated 26.08.2025 consequently direct the Respondents to allot the land bearing S.No.293 in Mallapuram Village, admeasuring 1.95.64 sq. meter to the petitioner under Ex- Servicemen Quota For Petitioner : Mr.S.N.Subramani 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36259 of 2025 For Respondent : Mr.P.Ganesan, GA ORDER This writ petition has been filed to directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2025. 2. Mr.P.Ganesan, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner, being an Ex-Armyman, is doing agricultural cultivation in the subject land, which is classified as “Kundru Poramboke”. Under these circumstances, the Warrant Officer sent a representation dated 23.09.2011 to the 1st respondent to allot the subject land to the petitioner under “Ex-Servicemen Quota”. Subsequently, the 1st respondent had forwarded the said representation to the 2nd respondent 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36259 of 2025 to take necessary action. Thereafter, the petitioner had also made an representation dated 26.08.2025 before the respondents for the very same request. However, the petitioner's representation was not considered by the respondents till date. Hence, this writ petition. 5. In reply, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents would request this Court to pass appropriate orders directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation filed by the petitioner. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 7. In the case on hand, the petitioner, being an Ex-Armyman, is doing agricultural cultivation in the subject land, which is classified as “Kundru Poramboke”. Under these circumstances, the Warrant Officer sent a representation dated 23.09.2011 to the 1st respondent to allot the 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36259 of 2025 subject land to the petitioner under “Ex-Servicemen Quota”. Subsequently, the 1st respondent had forwarded the said representation to the 2nd respondent to take necessary action. Thereafter, the petitioner had also made an representation dated 26.08.2025 before the respondents for the very same request. However, the petitioner's representation was not considered by the respondents till date. 8. In view of the above, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 26.08.2025 and dispose of the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of 6 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 9. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 24.09.2025 Speaking/Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No nsa 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36259 of 2025 To 1. The District Collector Kallakurichi 2. The District Revenue Divisional Officer Kallakurichi 3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Rdo Office, Kallakurichi 4. The Tashildar Taluk Office, Kallakurichi 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.36259 of 2025 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa W.P.No.36259 of 2025 24.09.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis