S. No. 39 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CCP 2/2025 in[SWP 1710/2016] c/w i)CCP(S) 449/2023 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Syed Mohtasim, Advocate. Vs. SHALENDRA KUMAR AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. G. N. Sofi, Dy.AG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE O R D E R 29.06.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondents have complied with the order under implementation, however, submits that the respondents did not accord benefits of monetary and notional benefits as prayed for. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that to that extent petitioner has availed the remedy before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. In this view of the matter, nothing survives in this contempt petition. Accordingly, same is closed with liberty to the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the learned Central Administrative Tribunal. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) JUDGE SRINAGAR 29.06.2026 Ishaq