165 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA M/S OSHO G.S. AND COMPANY SH RAVI BHAGAT IAS AND ORS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Dhamanpreet None for respondent No.4. HARKESH MANUJA Though of respondent No.4, however, l that order dated 08.07.2022 passed in CWP complied with, as such, he Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case he would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shal period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay respondent, the officer concerned Rs.50,000/- to 23.01.2025 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: M/S OSHO G.S. AND COMPANY Versus SH RAVI BHAGAT IAS AND ORS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. R.K. Girdhar, Advocate for the Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Dhamanpreet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No None for respondent No.4. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Though, there is a written request for adjournment ondent No.4, however, learned counsel order dated 08.07.2022 passed in CWP complied with, as such, he does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule discharged. However, in case, any claim of the petitioner still survives, would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the quarter concerned within a period of two of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking order thereupon, which shall be conveyed to the petitioner period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay , the officer concerned would be liable to pay cost(s) of to the petitioner from his/her own pocket. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HANDIGARH COCP-4424-2024 Date of Decision: January 23, 2025 ........Petitioner ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA ocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, AAG, Punjab. Kaur, Advocate for respondent No. 3. written request for adjournment on behalf counsel for the petitioner submits order dated 08.07.2022 passed in CWP-14338-2022 has been does not press the present petition. , any claim of the petitioner still survives, would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before two weeks from the release of payments, which shall be dealt with, as per law, within a period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking l be conveyed to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter and in case of any delay on the part of would be liable to pay cost(s) of from his/her own pocket. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 January 23, 2025 on behalf submits 2022 has been , any claim of the petitioner still survives, would be at liberty to raise their claim by filing representation before the release period of four weeks thereafter from the date of its receipt by passing a speaking within a on the part of would be liable to pay cost(s) of TEJWINDER SINGH 2025.01.24 14:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document