Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10406 (ALL)

VINDHYACHAL AND OTHERS v. NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTH. OF INDIA THR DIRECTOR AND OTHERS

WRIC/10648/2010 · 2025-10-09

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10648 of 2010 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. October 10, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chitra Sen Singh, S.N. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Divakar Rai Sharma, Hari Prasad Yadav, Mohammad Ali, R.K.Gupta (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Vindhyachal And Others .....Petitioner(s) National Highway Auth. Of India Thr Director And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad