Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10405 (UTT)

ISHWAR CHAND AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND3

WPCRL/933/2024 · 2025-07-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPCRL No.933 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. M.S. Bhandari, Advocate for the petitioners. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, A.G.A. with Ms. S.B. Dobhal, B.H. for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, on instructions, which are taken on record, submitted that after investigation a final report has been submitted in favour of the petitioners, which is not disputed by counsel for the petitioners. 4. In view of the submission made by counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in the present writ petition. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is closed. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.07.2025 SK