Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 104047 (ALL)

RAJENDRA PRASAD v. State of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/33866/2024 · 2025-02-04

Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33866 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Present writ petition is filed by petitioner praying that respondent no.2, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Chunar, Mirzapur to consider and decide the restoration application dated 15.08.2023 filed in Case No.T20171653031043831 (Rajendra Prasad vs. Suresh Singh) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2005. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case opposite party no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid suit in a time bound manner. 4. Looking into the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no.2, Naib Tehsildar, Tehsil Chunar, Mirzapur, be directed to decide the restoration application dated 15.08.2023 filed in Case No.T20171653031043831 (Rajendra Prasad vs. Suresh Singh) under Section 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2005 and decide the same in accordance with law, by a reasoned and speaking order, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks, after hearing all the parties concerned. 5. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition is disposed of. [Vivek Chaudhary,J.] Order Date :- 5.2.2025 C. MANI Digitally signed by :- CHANDRAMANI VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad