Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79624 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- Bijdhari District- East Champaran ====================================================== Shivpujan Rai S/o Late Lal Bahadur Rai R/o Vill- Jagirahan, P.S- Bijdhari, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ranjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 27-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 3(5), 117(2), 103(1), 303(2), 324(4), 329(3), 329(4), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS.
3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 04.05.2025 at about 06:00 A.M. when informant’s husband wen to attend natural call, all the accused persons including this petitioner along with 5-6 unknown persons brutally assaulted him by farsa, iron rod, khanti and other weapons. It is further alleged that the accused persons including this petitioner came at the house of the informant and destroyed her household
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.79624 of 2025(2) dt.27-11-2025 2/2 articles and took out ornaments worth of rs. 1,00,000/- and cash of Rs. 30,000/- from her house.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on account of old dispute, this petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Informant is not an eye witness to the alleged occurrence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 08.05.2025. Charge-sheet has already been submitted.
5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Bijdhari P. S. Case No. 33 of 2025.
AjayMishra/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T