HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34790 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Virendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Anant Pratap, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. No one appears on behalf of first informant. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 227 of 2024, under Sections- 115(2), 110, 352, 117(2) of B.N.S., Police Station- Mansoorpur, District- Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It has been further submitted that all the offence are punishable upto 7 years. Charge sheet has already been submitted, therefore, there is no requirement of custodial interrogation. It is further submitted that co-accused Gautam has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.16847 of 2025 vide order dated 14.07.2025. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 16.09.2025 having no criminal history. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail. 5. Thus, considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as well as law laid down by the Apex Court regarding offences punishable upto 7 years in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another reported in (2021) 10 SCC 773 and Siddharth vs State of U.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avinash Singh Chauhan, Virendra Singh Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ram Babu Tiwari Rohit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) and another; (2022) 1 SCC 676 and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. 6. Let the applicant- Rohit involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 9, 2025 Imtiyaz BAIL No. 34790 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad