SMT AASHMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2043/2025 · 2025-03-16
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 10403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:37542 Court No. - 74 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2043 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Aashma And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. In compliance to the earlier direction passed by coordinate Bench of this Court, entire documents have already been verified and the same has been provided through instructions received by learned Standing Counsel for the State, copy of the instructions through which documents have been verified, is taken on record.
2. A precise query has been made before learned Standing Counsel who is appearing in the instant matter that whether any justification has been given by concerned officer who instructed vide letter/instruction dated 08.03.2025 for extension of protection in favour of the petitioners and in reply it has been submitted by learned Standing Counsel that 'No, there is no justification mentioned in the instructions for extending police protection to the petitioners, as mentioned in the instructions'.
3. For verifying the instructions, it has been precisely queried that under which para the instruction contained that there is no justification for extending protection in favour of the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel submitted that it is crystal clearly mentioned in para-12 of the instruction which is reproduced herein below:-
"12- यह कहनना असत्य हहै कक प्रकतिवनाददी ससंख्यना 4 शहदीद खनानपपुत्र सपुलतिनान खनान कनवनासदी म 0 कना0 16/1 ममौहलना कछपपुरना यमपुनना कब्रिज चमौगनान थनानना ऐत्मनादमौलना जजलना आगरना नने यनाकचकनाकतिनार्ता ससंख्यना 1 व 2 कको हत्यना करवनानने ककी धमककी ददी हह व उसककी कनगरनानदी कर रहने हह।
4. By bare perusal of para-12 of the instruction, it is crystal clear that the fact ascertained in the petition is false and the same is not having any reality with regard to allegation put-forward against respondent no. 4.
5. There is hardly any case made out for extension of protection in favour of the petitioners.
6. The writ petition stands dismissed. Order Date :- 17.3.2025 #Vik/- Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad