Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:39814 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16318 of 2024 Petitioner :- Pancham Singh Respondent :- U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra With Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10923 of 2024 Petitioner :- Rajendra Pal Respondent :- Up State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra With Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10927 of 2024 Petitioner :- Mahendra Singh Respondent :- U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra With Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11037 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shri Niwas Respondent :- U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra With Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13161 of 2024 Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav Respondent :- Up State Agro Industrial Corporation Limited And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra With Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15371 of 2024 Petitioner :- Satya Pal Respondent :- State Of Up And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. Heard Ms. Anita Singh, holding brief of Sri Dinesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Ved Byas Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4. 2. These bunch of writ petitions were filed by the petitioners for payment of unpaid salary, arrears of increment, A.C.P., H.R.A. and other allowances. 3. Sri Ved Byas Mishra, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4, on the basis of instructions, submits that due payment has already been paid and respective affidavits have been filed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has not disputed that amount has been paid. However, she submits that according to petitioners, some amount is still unpaid. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, since the prayer of the petitioners is substantially addressed, therefore, all these writ petitions are disposed of. However, the petitioners will have the liberty that in case, still they are aggrieved or some amount is unpaid, they can approach the respondents by way of fresh application and it will be considered by the respondents, in accordance with law within a short time. Order Date :- 19.3.2025 Radhika Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad