Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 103993 (PNJ)

PUNJAB FINANCIAL COPORATION v. M/S REXONA HOSIERY AND ORS

CR/7443/2024 · 2025-04-09

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (123) PUNJAB FINANCIAL COPORATION M/S REXONA HOSIERY AND ORS CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN, 1. Constitution of India 07.11.2023 (Annexure P Ludhiana, vide which the execution petition filed by the petitioner has been disposed off. 2. unable to demonstrate the act and conduct of the petitioner, as well as the reasons for the inordinate delay of one year in challenging the order, counsel for the petitioner prays for the withdrawal of the present petition 3. petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 4. December 19, 2024 manju IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH PUNJAB FINANCIAL COPORATION Versus M/S REXONA HOSIERY AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN **** Mr. Harjaap Singh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed under Constitution of India praying for setting aside the 07.11.2023 (Annexure P-2) passed by the learned Additional District Judge Ludhiana, vide which the execution petition filed by the petitioner has been disposed off. After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case and being e to demonstrate the act and conduct of the petitioner, as well as the reasons for the inordinate delay of one year in challenging the order, counsel for the petitioner prays for the withdrawal of the present petition Without commenting on the merits petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. December 19, 2024 Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7443-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 19.12.2024 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Harjaap Singh Arora, Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of the praying for setting aside the impugned order dated 2) passed by the learned Additional District Judge Ludhiana, vide which the execution petition filed by the petitioner has been After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case and being e to demonstrate the act and conduct of the petitioner, as well as the reasons for the inordinate delay of one year in challenging the order, counsel for the petitioner prays for the withdrawal of the present petition. Without commenting on the merits of the case, the present Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 19.12.2024 ……Petitioner ……Respondents of the impugned order dated 2) passed by the learned Additional District Judge Ludhiana, vide which the execution petition filed by the petitioner has been After arguing vehemently on the merits of the case and being e to demonstrate the act and conduct of the petitioner, as well as the reasons for the inordinate delay of one year in challenging the order, counsel of the case, the present Manju 2025.01.08 10:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document