Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 10399 (RAJ)

KEDAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLW/339/2018 · 2025-03-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12414] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 339/2018 Kedar S/o Shri Moti Ram, aged about 42 years, R/o Dorawali Tehsil Todabheem, Distt. Karauli. ----Accused/ Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur. ….State Respondent 2. Raghuveer Singh S/o Shri Maniram, R/o Shalukala, P.s. Sujangarh, Distt. Jhunjhunu Raj. Presently Working As Sho Station House Officer P.s. Todabheem, Distt. Karauli Raj. 3. Jagdish Chadra Arya Ras Presently Working As Sub Divisional Collector Cum Magistrate, Tehsil Todab …...Concerned Officers 4. Ghanshyam Sharma S/o Shri Nemilal Sharma, R/o Dorawali, Tehsil And Police Station Todabheem, Distt. Karauli Raj. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Kumar Avasthi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/03/2025 1. The present criminal writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to quash the proceedings of Complaint/Case No.46/2018 pending before the Court of learned Sub Divisional Collector & Magistrate, Todabheem, District Karauli under the provisions of Section 107/151 of Cr.P.C. 2. Considered and perused the material available on record. [2025:RJ-JP:12414] (2 of 3) [CRLW-339/2018] 3. The S.H.O., Police Station Todabheem, District Karauli submitted a complaint under Sections 107, 151 Cr.P.C. before the Sub Divisional Officer (in short ‘SDO’), Todabheem, District Karauli against the petitioner- Kedar S/o Shri Moti Ram. 4. After having considered the contents of the complaint and the material submitted alongwith it, the SDO vide order dated 13.02.2018 was convinced that the conduct of the petitioner may disrupt the law situated, therefore, he was bound and was ordered to be released on submitting two sureties of government servants. 5. Against the order dated 13.02.2018, the petitioner had preferred the Criminal Revision Petition No.30/2018 before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, No.1, Hindauncity. The aforesaid revision petition filed by the petitioner was allowed vide order dated 23.02.2018, setting aside the order dated 13.02.2018 and the SDO, Todabheem District Karauli was directed to release the petitioner on submitting the bail bond of Rs.10,000/-. 6. As per the provisions of Section 107/151 Cr.P.C., on a report by the concerned Police Station, the persons in regard to whom there is apprehension that they may disrupt the law situated, were kept bound for a period of six months and were being asked to submit the bail bonds and sureties. 7. In the present case, the complaint was filed in the year 2018 and thus, the period of six months for which he was bound to maintain peace, has already expired long back. 8. On perusal of the averments made in the present petition also, the Court finds no ground to make any interference. 9. Accordingly, the present criminal writ petition is dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:12414] (3 of 3) [CRLW-339/2018] 10. Since the main petition has been dismissed, the stay application and pending application /s, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /61