HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15206 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ikram Ahmad, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that he was initially appointed as Class- IV employee, however, an order came to be passed on 11.01.2010 by the disciplinary authority/ District Panchayat Raj Officer, whereby one increment was withheld on cumulative basis against which, the writ petitioner preferred an appeal, which came to be rejected on 07.02.2010 and thereafter on 29.08.2022, the Addl. Director (Administration), Panchayat Raj, Uttar Pradesh proceeded to issue a communication requiring the writ petitioner, if he is so aggrieved to prefer a representation / revision before the State Government, pursuant whereto the writ petitioner claims to have preferred a revision, the date whereof has not been mentioned in para-14 of the writ petition. 3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for quashing of the order dated 11.01.2010. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that whatever might be, in case, the writ petitioner has preferred a revision under Section 23 of U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 before the State Government, then in case it has not been decide, would be decided. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of requiring the writ petitioner to press the revision before the competent authority, which is stated to be pending. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Asar Mukhtar, Ikram Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Indra Pal Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 6. For facilitation and early disposal, a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order be produced before the competent authority by 17.10.2025, and the competent authority on verifying the fact as to whether the revision has been preferred or not, in case revision has been preferred and it is available on record, then the same shall be decided within two months. October 8, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15206 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad